All Posts

Proxxon as
Axminster GIF
Photobucket
Mini DRO Icon 150
Discount panel
Photobucket
M Machine ad
Photobucket

Simple two stroke – 6

'Debbie' despite international efforts still refuses to run unaided and is now sadly destined to the 'non-runners' shelf until a solution can be found.

'Debbie' despite international efforts still refuses to run unaided and is now sadly destined to the 'non-runners' shelf until a solution can be found.

Well, sadly, I feel as though I have come to the end of the road with ‘Debbie’. Not only have I spent two months of workshop time but minds with far more knowledge than mine have applied both theoretical brain power and practical skills in what has turned out to be an international effort to resolve this frustrating issue.

‘Aussie’ Jim who has also built a ‘Debbie’ has encountered the same problem as myself in that the engine will fire when aided by the electric starter but simply won’t run under it’s own power. Jim has been to extraordinary lengths to get to the route of the problem using such fault seeking devices as a colourtune plug to view and video the action of the spark plug plus oscilloscope, stroboscope and as far as I know even a kaleidoscope but all to no avail. Jim also tried a bigger flywheel to increase momentum between power strokes and even a smaller flywheel in case the standard flywheel was just too much.

Once or twice I have succeeded in getting my engine to run for maybe 15 or 20 seconds unaided then it simply fades away as it misfires and fourstrokes. I have tried both mechanical coil and contact breaker and more lately an electronic CDI ignition system but with no apparent difference between the two.

I have made a compression seal for the piston rod to minimise any leakage of compressed vapour during the transfer process.

Many hours have been spent perfecting the action of the non-return valve which according to Jan is the most likely cause of poor and non-running engines.

I have made a modified version of the vacuum carb incorporating throttle control. I have also made a revised cylinder head to provide better gas flow and place the spark into that flow.

Jim and I are not the first to encounter difficulties with this engine as last year there was a thread on Model Engineer forum where two or three builders of this engine came up against identical problems.

So, sadly, ‘Debbie’ will be put on a shelf and before starting my next project I shall attend to a number of pressing service issues in the workshop including an overhaul of my DRO system on the mill and a general tidy up after weeks of neglect.

With thanks to all those who expressed an interest in this project and those who took the time and trouble to offer advice. I know of at least one undaunted visitor to my site who is bravely midway through his build of ‘Debbie’ and I am just hoping and praying that he may come up with the answer – good luck Dan !

Opus Proximum 1

p10004981

Opus Proximum – a vertical engine by Stan Bray published in a special issue ‘The Best of  Model Engineer’.

Fellow model engineer and regular visitor to my site Malcolm Tompkins (now sadly deceased) was attracted to this vertical engine as his next project. The plans and build notes are published in ‘The Best of Model Engineer’ an Autumn 2009 special.

The plans show construction in both metric and imperial measurements but don’t try to mix them – they won’t work !

Having decided that a vertical engine would also be a welcome addition to my line up of model engines I felt that upping the size by 50% would produce a more impressive result. At the same time both  Malcolm and I  felt that metric was the way to go with easier calculations and a better choice of fasteners.

The plans were enlarged to fit on A3 sheets. All the original dimensions were tipexed out and the new metric  dimensions, upped by 50%, were inserted and final A3 copies run off. I would hasten to point out that both Malcolm and I bought a copy of the magazine so there was no distribution of freebies !

A study of the article and plans did throw up one or two teasers. The most obvious being the photograph on page 29 which showed a completely different arrangement of the main bearings, crankshaft and connecting rod. I came to the conclusion that this was an error and will therefore be ignored in our build.  I also came across one or two other anomalies. For example the instructions on positioning holes for the cylinder (2) PCD – should have read (12). Similarly the valve chest was given as 16mm wide yet the cover was given as 15mm. Care is therefore required as we machine each piece to ensure that it corresponds with related components.

remember, you can click on each photograph for an enlarged image

Machine cylinder and top cover ensuring of bolt holes without the need for digital readout facility on rotary table. Note dimensions are for engine increased by 50% from plan.

Machine cylinder and top cover ensuring alignment of bolt holes without the need for digital readout facility on rotary table. Note dimensions are for engine increased by 50% from plan.

The bolt circle programme referred to in the captioned photographs does require digital read out capability on ‘X’ and ‘Y’ axis. There is an alternative method of tackling the cylinder and cover best illustrated with this sketch and notes

1.     Square up a 50mm length of brass to 24mm square.

2.     Bob it in your lathe’s self centering 4 jaw chuck, face both ends then turn the first 5mm down to 24mm dia.

3.     Machine locating lip to 1.5mm deep.

4.     Transfer to R.T. spot the position of each of the eight bolt holes and drill 2mm to depth of 8mm.

5.     Transfer back to lathe, centre drill the 3mm piston rod hole and part off the cylinder head cover. This will now be aprox 3mm deep including lip. (f your parting cutter is wider than 2mm then increase the 5mm turning in point 2 as necessary.

6.     You may need to skim the top of your cylinder cover later on your mill to clean up and bring to required overall depth.

7.     Similarly I should take a fine facing cut off the top of the cylinder so everything is nice and square.

8.     You can now drill and bore your cylinder to 15mm (or a whisper under the size of your most appropriate reamer).

9.     Return back to R.T. and machine away two corners until the desired shape has been achieved.

Email me if you require further information or assistance with this procedure  john@start-model-engineering.co.uk

Moving on to the shaping of the cylinder. This was done utilising the rotary table on my milling machine. It would be possible to form the shape by careful hand filing or, alternatively, leaving the cylinder in its square shape.

The project was brought to a halt at this stage for adjustment of the dimensions on the plan.

Opus P. moves on

The next stage was to sort out the motion plate by machining the top mounting lugs for the cross head slide bars. The hole centres on the cylinder lugs are 30mm apart so this dimension is repeated for the top slide bar positions.

We now get to the stage where there are a number of detail jobs to be completed. I confess to not having taken many photographs but if you have successfully reached this stage with your build then I don’t anticipate that you will have much problem in the finishing stages. However, should you require any guidance I am only an email away and more than happy to give you the benefit of my (limited) experience.

Opus P (further progress)

TLC   (in model engineering terms this means – take light cuts)

Now there should be a batch of photographs showing some detail work on the motion plate (milling slide bar lugs), soldering the base of the cylinder into position, etc. ( following my experience I urge you NOT to solder and go for a good snug press fit bonded with a thin covering of Loctite). Anyway as a result of a flat battery camera I didn’t get any pics but it was all relatively straightforward so you should have few problems (yes I know, famous last words !).

Today, with my battery recharged, my attention turned to making the eccentric strap. A tricky piece of machining on both the mill and the lathe. The secret, like most model engineering activities, is take your time and take light cuts – oh and measure a lot, then measure again.

Opus P. (continued)

Updated Friday 13th November

undaunted Stan Bray’s engine project continues

After having given the plans a good looking at I decided to proceed, amending the depth of the steam chest from 18mm down to 11mm (to be on the safe side increase to 12mm) which provides sufficient clearance for the valve movement.

One feature of particular concern was the process of making and attaching the two lugs either side of the cylinder, required to support the slide columns.  To improve the accuracy of fitting I machined a pin on each lug and a corresponding location hole on each side of the cylinder. This modification eased the process of accurately silver soldering the lugs into position.

“to err is human……”

Having completed the cylinder, steam chest and valve the good news is that I am happy that they will perform their function. However, the downside is that visually the alignment between cylinder and steam chest is not good. Attempts to correct have not really been successful and to rectify would involve several days work.

The next stage was to sort out the motion plate by machining the top mounting lugs for the cross head slide bars. The hole centres on the cylinder lugs are 30mm apart so this dimension is repeated for the top slide bar positions.