All Posts

Proxxon as
Axminster GIF
Photobucket
Mini DRO Icon 150
Discount panel
Photobucket
M Machine ad
Photobucket

Opus Proximum 1

p10004981

Opus Proximum – a vertical engine by Stan Bray published in a special issue ‘The Best of  Model Engineer’.

Fellow model engineer and regular visitor to my site Malcolm Tompkins (now sadly deceased) was attracted to this vertical engine as his next project. The plans and build notes are published in ‘The Best of Model Engineer’ an Autumn 2009 special.

The plans show construction in both metric and imperial measurements but don’t try to mix them – they won’t work !

Having decided that a vertical engine would also be a welcome addition to my line up of model engines I felt that upping the size by 50% would produce a more impressive result. At the same time both  Malcolm and I  felt that metric was the way to go with easier calculations and a better choice of fasteners.

The plans were enlarged to fit on A3 sheets. All the original dimensions were tipexed out and the new metric  dimensions, upped by 50%, were inserted and final A3 copies run off. I would hasten to point out that both Malcolm and I bought a copy of the magazine so there was no distribution of freebies !

A study of the article and plans did throw up one or two teasers. The most obvious being the photograph on page 29 which showed a completely different arrangement of the main bearings, crankshaft and connecting rod. I came to the conclusion that this was an error and will therefore be ignored in our build.  I also came across one or two other anomalies. For example the instructions on positioning holes for the cylinder (2) PCD – should have read (12). Similarly the valve chest was given as 16mm wide yet the cover was given as 15mm. Care is therefore required as we machine each piece to ensure that it corresponds with related components.

remember, you can click on each photograph for an enlarged image

Machine cylinder and top cover ensuring of bolt holes without the need for digital readout facility on rotary table. Note dimensions are for engine increased by 50% from plan.

Machine cylinder and top cover ensuring alignment of bolt holes without the need for digital readout facility on rotary table. Note dimensions are for engine increased by 50% from plan.

The bolt circle programme referred to in the captioned photographs does require digital read out capability on ‘X’ and ‘Y’ axis. There is an alternative method of tackling the cylinder and cover best illustrated with this sketch and notes

1.     Square up a 50mm length of brass to 24mm square.

2.     Bob it in your lathe’s self centering 4 jaw chuck, face both ends then turn the first 5mm down to 24mm dia.

3.     Machine locating lip to 1.5mm deep.

4.     Transfer to R.T. spot the position of each of the eight bolt holes and drill 2mm to depth of 8mm.

5.     Transfer back to lathe, centre drill the 3mm piston rod hole and part off the cylinder head cover. This will now be aprox 3mm deep including lip. (f your parting cutter is wider than 2mm then increase the 5mm turning in point 2 as necessary.

6.     You may need to skim the top of your cylinder cover later on your mill to clean up and bring to required overall depth.

7.     Similarly I should take a fine facing cut off the top of the cylinder so everything is nice and square.

8.     You can now drill and bore your cylinder to 15mm (or a whisper under the size of your most appropriate reamer).

9.     Return back to R.T. and machine away two corners until the desired shape has been achieved.

Email me if you require further information or assistance with this procedure  john@start-model-engineering.co.uk

Moving on to the shaping of the cylinder. This was done utilising the rotary table on my milling machine. It would be possible to form the shape by careful hand filing or, alternatively, leaving the cylinder in its square shape.

The project was brought to a halt at this stage for adjustment of the dimensions on the plan.

Opus P. problems

Apart from some cosmetic detail Opus P. is now completed but steadfastly refuses to show any signs of life. Examinations will continue but my suspicions lie with the porting arrangements.

Apart from some cosmetic detail Opus P. is now completed but steadfastly refuses to show any signs of life. Examinations will continue but my suspicions lie with the porting arrangements.

I am concious of the fact that a number of people have been following the build of Stan Bray’s Opus Proximum and that they may be wondering why this thread has ground to a halt.

The truth of the matter is that so far, despite, my best efforts, Opus refuses to run. Not only will it not run there is absolutely no sign of life. My suspicions focus on the inlet and exit porting arrangements and I need to carry out some visual comparison tests against similar valve arrangements on one or two of my Elmer engines. Even before I attempted to put some air through my Opus P. the opening and closing of ports didn’t seem to be quite right. When air was connected up it appeared to run straight through and out of the exhaust regardless of the stage in the cycle. There is a slight change in note as the valve moves in the chest but there is clearly something basic that is not right.

As readers will know I did discover a number of anomalies with the plans for Opus P. and I am beginning to wonder if this string of errors includes the critical porting arrangement.
It may be a few days before I am able to continue further examination if meanwhile any readers have any thoughts or ideas I would be very interested to hear from you. Indeed I would be interested to hear from anyone building the Opus P. and to hear of their experiences.

Opus P. moves on

The next stage was to sort out the motion plate by machining the top mounting lugs for the cross head slide bars. The hole centres on the cylinder lugs are 30mm apart so this dimension is repeated for the top slide bar positions.

We now get to the stage where there are a number of detail jobs to be completed. I confess to not having taken many photographs but if you have successfully reached this stage with your build then I don’t anticipate that you will have much problem in the finishing stages. However, should you require any guidance I am only an email away and more than happy to give you the benefit of my (limited) experience.

Opus P (further progress)

TLC   (in model engineering terms this means – take light cuts)

Now there should be a batch of photographs showing some detail work on the motion plate (milling slide bar lugs), soldering the base of the cylinder into position, etc. ( following my experience I urge you NOT to solder and go for a good snug press fit bonded with a thin covering of Loctite). Anyway as a result of a flat battery camera I didn’t get any pics but it was all relatively straightforward so you should have few problems (yes I know, famous last words !).

Today, with my battery recharged, my attention turned to making the eccentric strap. A tricky piece of machining on both the mill and the lathe. The secret, like most model engineering activities, is take your time and take light cuts – oh and measure a lot, then measure again.

Opus P. (continued)

Updated Friday 13th November

undaunted Stan Bray’s engine project continues

After having given the plans a good looking at I decided to proceed, amending the depth of the steam chest from 18mm down to 11mm (to be on the safe side increase to 12mm) which provides sufficient clearance for the valve movement.

One feature of particular concern was the process of making and attaching the two lugs either side of the cylinder, required to support the slide columns.  To improve the accuracy of fitting I machined a pin on each lug and a corresponding location hole on each side of the cylinder. This modification eased the process of accurately silver soldering the lugs into position.

“to err is human……”

Having completed the cylinder, steam chest and valve the good news is that I am happy that they will perform their function. However, the downside is that visually the alignment between cylinder and steam chest is not good. Attempts to correct have not really been successful and to rectify would involve several days work.

The next stage was to sort out the motion plate by machining the top mounting lugs for the cross head slide bars. The hole centres on the cylinder lugs are 30mm apart so this dimension is repeated for the top slide bar positions.

Opus P – now running !

Anyone following the thread of my build of Stan Bray’s Opus Proximum may be interested to hear that we now have a runner !
It was whilst I was setting up the steam chest valve on my recent build of Elmer’s vertical mill engine that the penny dropped. Sure enough, on examining Opus P. I could see that there was no point in the travel of the valve where both ports were fully closed – bingo ! A modified valve was produced and away she went.
So I am happy to have a reasonably satisfactory conclusion to this build although a certain amount of finishing is still required but for now I am happy to progress to other things.
Should anyone ask me my opinion on which vertical mill engine to build, Elmer’s or Stan’s I would have to go with Elmer’s. Anyway, time to move on.